Culvert Liner Flow Capacity for Culvert Renew® Liners

Full-flow comparison at 1% slope using Manning’s equation: legacy host pipes vs. smooth-bore HDPE culvert liner.Typical roughness: CMP n = 0.024, RCCP n = 0.015,  Renew Liner n = 0.009.

Method & Assumptions

Charts compare full-pipe flow at 1% slope using Manning’s equation. The smoother liner (n ≈ 0.009) often offsets the reduced diameter during slip-lining, and in many sizes increases full-flow capacity versus deteriorated corrugated metal pipe (CMP).

Results are shown both against CMP (n = 0.024) and RCCP (n = 0.015) for common host/liner size pairs. If the project team is still deciding whether rehabilitation or excavation is the better path, pair this chart with the culvert liner overview and the reline-vs-replace guide.

What does “% Flow” mean?

It’s the ratio of calculated liner flow to host pipe flow at the same slope and full condition. > 100% means the liner passes more flow than the host.

  • CMP n = 0.024 • RCCP n = 0.015 • Renew Liner n = 0.009
  • Full-pipe condition at 1% (S = 0.01)
  • Pairs reflect common host → liner IDs used in rehab

Percent of Host Flow (Full @ 1% Slope)

CMP vs Liner — Liner % of Host Flow (full, 1% slope)

Bars show liner flow ÷ host flow × 100. Host roughness: CMP n = 0.024; Liner roughness: n = 0.009.

Scale up to 180%
Host CMP 12" → Liner 10"
164%
Host CMP 15" → Liner 12"
147%
Host CMP 18" → Liner 13.5"
124%
Host CMP 18" → Liner 15"
164%
Host CMP 21" → Liner 15"
109%
Host CMP 24" → Liner 18"
124%
Host CMP 27" → Liner 21"
136%
Host CMP 30" → Liner 24"
147%
Host CMP 33" → Liner 24"
114%
Host CMP 36" → Liner 27"
124%
Host CMP 42" → Liner 30"
109%
Host CMP 48" → Liner 36"
124%
Host CMP 54" → Liner 40"
120%
Host CMP 60" → Liner 42"
103%
Host CMP 66" → Liner 48"
114%
Host CMP 72" → Liner 54"
124%
Host CMP 78" → Liner 54"
100%
Host CMP 84" → Liner 60"
109%
Host CMP 96" → Liner 72"
124%
Host CMP 120" → Liner 84"
103%

Values computed via Manning’s equation for full-pipe flow at 1% slope, using the provided chart dataset.

CMP (n = 0.024) vs Liner (n = 0.009)

Based on pipe flowing full at 1% slope.

CMP ID (in.)Liner ID (in.)CMP FlowLiner Flow% Flow
12108661,419164%
15121,5692,308147%
1813.52,5523,160124%
18152,5524,185164%
21153,8504,185109%
24185,4976,806124%
27217,52610,267136%
30249,96814,659147%
332412,85314,659114%
362716,21020,070124%
423024,45326,581109%
483634,91343,226124%
544047,79957,251120%
604263,30765,207103%
664881,62993,102114%
7254102,950127,463124%
7854127,449127,463100%
8460155,301168,818109%
9672221,737274,534124%
12084402,066414,136103%

RCCP (n = 0.015) vs Liner (n = 0.009)

Based on pipe flowing full at 1% slope.

RCCP ID (in.)Liner ID (in.)RCCP FlowLiner Flow% Flow
12101,3851,419102.5%
15122,5112,30891.9%
18154,0844,185102.5%
21156,1604,18567.9%
24188,7966,80677.4%
272112,04210,26785.3%
302415,94914,65991.9%
332720,56420,07097.6%
363025,93626,581102.5%
423639,12443,226110.5%
484055,86157,251102.5%
544276,47865,20785.3%
6048101,29193,10291.9%
6654130,607127,46397.6%
7260164,720168,818102.5%
8472248,482274,534110.5%
9684354,780414,136116.7%
12096643,306591,30091.9%

Note: For some pairs the RCCP host (n = 0.015) exceeds the liner capacity.

Need a project-specific hydraulic check?

We’ll run site slopes, partial-flow conditions, and inlet/outlet control for your exact geometry.

Support image

Related Guides

Keep the cluster path moving with the next pages for product fit, hydraulics, trenchless workflow, and replacement decisions.

Specifications

Review ASTM and AASHTO references, material properties, dimensions, and installation notes for design and submittal work.

Open the spec page

Culvert Liner Overview

Use the main product pillar to confirm trenchless fit before moving deeper into material, hydraulics, or replacement decisions.

Review product overview

Culvert Relining

Follow the trenchless path for host-pipe fit, slip-lining workflow, and when rehabilitation still beats excavation.

See relining workflow

Reline vs Replace

Use the decision guide when the project team is weighing trenchless renewal against full excavation and replacement.

Use the decision guide